What
Part Of "No Law" Don't They Understand?
Jan Ireland
Much of the country needs a constitutional lesson, and they need
it quickly. The state of Alabama has become ground zero for a constitutional
fight, the significance of which escapes most of the country. It
is possible that we are approaching a quiet pre-Armageddon. Without
fanfare, in a climate of political correctness run amok, we could
be on the way to giving up a right more precious than we seem able
to realize. The right to acknowledge God.
I would venture that most people in the nation, educated or not,
religious or not, think ¡°separation of church and state¡± is constitutional
law. It is not. It is not even regular law. Thomas Jefferson gave
us the phrase, in a letter to a religious group in 1802. The Bill
of Rights, in which the First Amendment rests, were ratified in
1791, a decade prior.
The First Amendment actually says ¡°Congress shall make no law respecting
an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
¡¡± There is more (speech, press, assembly, petition to redress),
but the fight in Alabama concerns this first phrase.
There is a penchant of many to quote the First Amendment through
the comma, leaving out ¡°¡or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
¡¡±. (Grammar rules aren¡¯t the headiest of studies.) But the two
parts need each other. Together they form a right reserved by the
Founding Fathers for us, through foresight which can only be termed
prescient. It is possible to imagine that they foresaw exactly what
is happening in Alabama today.
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Judge Roy Moore was elected
on campaign promises to acknowledge God, and to remember that the
Ten Commandments were the basis of our United States Constitution,
as well as the Alabama Constitution. He has been, and is, doing
exactly that. Two years ago, he had a monument installed in a public
area. That monument has quotes from several historic documents ¨C
including the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution,
the Alabama Constitution, and the Ten Commandments.
Tens of thousands of supporters have clearly voiced their approval
of the judge¡¯s actions. 22 in one morning went to jail rather than
desert his cause. Online petitions have delivered a multitude of
approving signatures across the nation.
But
even if that approval were not there, Judge Roy Moore would still
be doing the correct thing. He is, in fact, doing the constitutional
thing. The estimable Dr. Alan Keyes has several times reminded us
of the quite simple truth. Dr. Keyes asks to be shown the law that
Judge Moore is supposed to be breaking. Obviously, Dr. Keyes knows
the law cannot be shown, because the Constitution is very clear.
Congress, it says, will make NO law concerning that issue.
Unfortunately, judges over time, even Supreme Court judges, have
constructed such a ¡°wall.¡± Judges are human, and judges have erred.
Judges once ruled that slavery was the law of the land. Do we follow
that ¡°law¡± today? Thomas Jefferson also said, ¡°The opinion which
gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional
and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action
but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would
make the Judiciary a despotic branch.
How
portentous those words of Jefferson may turn out to be.
The trappings of political correctness have inured us to protesting.
The few who volubly dissent, are drowned out by the inaction of
the unaware. Our legislatures have forgotten that they are one of
three equal branches, and are meekly accepting the personal agendas
some activist judges are forcing on America. As a nation, we have
begun to accept rulings we know are wrong, perhaps only for the
silly reason of avoiding scorn.
Evidence
that the Ten Commandments are the basis of our legal system can
clearly be seen in our laws and judicial process. Evidence that
its influence permeated our society (at least until groups like
the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State,
got footholds) is all around us. Behind the seats of the nine justices
of the nation¡¯s Supreme Court is a marble display of, you guessed
it, the Ten Commandments. ¡°In God We Trust¡± is on our money. ¡°So
Help Me God¡± is how we tell a court we will be truthful. |
In the recent past, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
tried to see the Pledge of Allegiance as unconstitutional. A religious
plaque that had been at the Grand Canyon for decades was challenged.
The Boy Scouts have been barred from using public land. Nativity
scenes have been erased from public view. Christmas Vacation has
been renamed Winter Break. Principals have refused to allow students
to start the day by saying the Pledge of Allegiance in publicly
funded schools. State supreme courts have mocked written, settled,
legislated law. Public schools are turning out students who can
barely read, much less be aware of the intricacies of the Constitution.
This issue has been categorized as ¡°right-wing religious extremist¡±
in many reports. I heard a vacuous airhead on a mainstream media
¡°news¡± show derisively ask if the Judge would allow a statue of
Mohammed in the rotunda. The pesky perkies miss the constitutional
point. Congress shall make no law on this issue, so the decision
then falls to the people of the state. Alabamians could decide to
erect a statue of Mohammed, as many places have erected statues
of Greek gods.
Think this article sounds a specious alarm? At this writing, it
has just been reported that an interfaith group called the American
Clergy Leadership Conference is calling for Christian churches everywhere
to remove their crosses - since Christian crosses represent oppression,
bigotry, and perceived superiority.
Whether you are Christian, Jewish, Muslim, atheist, agnostic, or
the ubiquitous other ¨C some facts are unassailable.
In 1954, the legislature inserted ¡°under God¡± into the Pledge
of Allegiance. Since then, several things have happened.
It was one nation, under God, that put a man on the moon; that traversed
segregation and emerged on the side of freedom; that endured Vietnam;
that survived the Communist Party¡¯s attempted infiltration; that
won the cold war; that recovered from 9-11.
It is one nation, under God, that Cubans risk their very lives to
float to; that Mexicans risk death from heat exhaustion to be driven
to; that millions from virtually every corner of the globe spend
lives and heartache to get to.
And it is one nation, under God, that is now leading the fight in
the war against terrorism ¨C possibly the last, best hope for the
survival of the world.
Whether we are religious or not, whether we go to church or not,
the right to acknowledge God is central to the history of America.
We¡¯d better be sure what part of ¡°no law¡± we don¡¯t understand.
And we¡¯d better pray that Congress makes no law about religion.
Jan Ireland is a masters level counselor/teacher. She says that
obfuscation in the media prompts her to search for the hidden.
Why
the Pledge of Allegiance IS and WILL REMAIN Constitutional
--
editorial
Our Pledge of Allegiance is not a prayer nor a pledge to God--it
is a pledge of loyalty to America! To Pledge Allegiance is to state
your personal commitment to our nation and its traditions and principles
of governance.
People from many countries literally give up everything to gain
American citizenship and freedom. Meanwhile, some living on our
shores--who may not be loyal American citizens since they have refused
to pledge Allegiance to the United States under the legislatively-approved
Pledge we have used for half a century--are trying to take the best
of America away--our religious freedoms.
Our Pledge now correctly describes our republic as one nation, under
God--it can be clearly shown that our Founding Founders established
America on the premise that freedom comes from God, not the State.
Lies enslave but "The Truth Shall Set You Free!"
One more thing--if you refuse to raise and pledge allegiance to
America's flag--or if you burn an American flag--then just what
other country ARE you loyal to?
-- Lyman Stucky, Executive Director, Spirit Of Allegiance
October 15, 2002
|